Hi Ceel,
Next the some spontaneous thoughts (caused by this hot evening and glass of the cool beer).
I think too that we should review the flavors contents. What we have now?
Entire idea of 4-in-1 russian dolls is great. And while I see no sense in flavors other than smallest base and biggest core, some SliTaz users here, on the forum, claims that core flavor is not need, is overhead, and other words... That SliTaz-3 was the best, while SliTaz-4 was break the TAZ idea and can not calls SliTaz at all.
Hmm, some people use gtkonly. Well... But did anyone use justx? It is doubtful, IMHO.
Justx is useful only as basis for other custom flavors.
To continue, I think we should review use-cases for the flavors.
base.
The flavor for the SliTaz server-side infrastructure — for the servers that serves slitaz.org, hg.slitaz.org, cook.slitaz.org... I doubt they need Wi-Fi or NTFS at all.
justx.
Unusable in the current conditions. May be used as base for other flavors that not use GTK. Please correct me.
gtkonly.
Semi-unusable reduced version of the core flavor. It missed any web-browser, so our shiny TazPanel not work here, and we should write other GUIs (Yad-based) for configuring the system. IMHO it's the overhead. Please correct me again.
core.
May be it was good balanced choice in SliTaz-4 times, but it has some pitfalls now.
To be more user-friendly we should add here more drivers. But then ISO size will grow significantly, and the small ISO size is the dead end, alas.
For example, on the some hardware (you may find it here on the old topics) we need some specific video-card drivers to work. It just not works with the default (VESA-based?) video driver. And it will be good to add different video-drivers to ISO.
At least we provide terminal-based tool to install different video-drivers. It is good, but seems terminal-session not works on that equipment too. And, more to say, we need to rise internet (in most cases, Wi-Fi) as you rightly remarked in the terminal session. For example, my Wi-Fi card needs additional firmware (b43) that not exists even in form of packages. SliTaz is Linux distro for geeks exclusively, isn't is looks like?
So, as you can see, I have no solution.
In addition, SliTaz is claimed to be Linux distro for old hardware. Seems like (unreleased) SliTaz-5 will satisfy this claim. I working on updating the packages to the actual versions, and while it also is light-as-it-can-be, it will not be intended to use with the old hardware...