I just installed from a 5.0 Live-CD to the harddrive. Using the Live-CD I had the correct monitor resolution of 1280 x 1024, but after booting from the harddrive it is only 1024x768.
I use an old Nvidia card
[blockquote]05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation NV44 [GeForce 7100 GS] (rev a1)[/blockquote]
lsmod shows that for video nouveau is used. The Xorg Vesa video driver is installed. But how to make use of it?
[blockquote]
root@slitaz:~$ ls /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/
35-synaptics.conf 40-Keyboard.conf 40-evdev.conf 45-synaptics.conf
[/blockquote]
Any ideas available here?

5.0 - unsufficient resolution
(7 posts) (3 voices)-
Posted 10 years ago #
-
5.0 live cd includes 2 video drivers xorg-xf86-video-fbdev and xorg-xf86-video-vesa
Check /var/log/Xorg.0.log when booted live with 1280x1024 compared to booted in the install at 1024x768 to see which video driver is in use.Posted 10 years ago # -
http://root:root@tazpanel:82/pkgs.cgi?search=nvidia&repo=Any
I think "xorg-xf86-video-nouveau" driver is best choice:
http://root:root@tazpanel:82/pkgs.cgi?do=Install&xorg-xf86-video-nouveau
Also with default xorg-xf86-video-fbdev you can try video=1280x1024 kernel option.Posted 10 years ago # -
Ok, when I boot from the Live-CD I see in Xorg.0.log that it seems to work with fbdev:
22.197] (**) FBDEV(1): using shadow framebuffer
[ 22.197] (II) Loading sub module "shadow"
[ 22.197] (II) LoadModule: "shadow"
[ 22.197] (II) Loading /usr/lib/X11/modules/libshadow.so
[ 22.197] (II) Module shadow: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[ 22.197] compiled for 1.12.4, module version = 1.1.0
[ 22.197] ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4
[ 22.197] (II) UnloadModule: "vesa"
[ 22.197] (==) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp
[ 22.209] (==) FBDEV(0): Backing store disabled
[ 22.217] (EE) FBDEV(0): FBIOPUTCMAP: Invalid argument
many error messages, then
22.230] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable
[ 22.230] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI capable
[ 22.230] (EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so failed (/usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory)
[ 22.230] (EE) GLX: could not load software renderer
[ 22.230] (II) GLX: no usable GL providers found for screen 0But lsmod shows me that nouveau is loaded:
root@slitaz:~$ lsmod | grep nouveau
nouveau 559755 2
mxm_wmi 1019 1 nouveau
video 9495 1 nouveau
i2c_algo_bit 3627 1 nouveau
ttm 36584 1 nouveau
drm_kms_helper 17504 1 nouveau
drm 118562 3 nouveau,ttm,drm_kms_helper
hwmon 865 1 nouveau
i2c_core 12294 4 nouveau,i2c_algo_bit,drm_kms_helper,drm
button 3286 1 nouveauroot@slitaz:~$ tazhw detected-modules
Detected PCI and USB modules
================================================================================
ohci_hcd
ehci_hcd
pata_amd
sata_nv
sata_nv
forcedeth
pcieport
pcieport
pcieport
pcieportBut:
root@slitaz:~$ tazhw detect-pci
Detected PCI devices Kernel modules
================================================================================
* Builtin module : ohci_hcd
* Builtin module : ehci_hcd
* Builtin module : pata_amd
* Builtin module : sata_nv
* Builtin module : forcedeth
* Builtin module : pcieport
> Module in use : snd_ca0106
> Module in use : sky2
> Module in use : nouveauWhen I blacklist nouveau in the hard-drive install I do not get an X-screen.
Hopefully this information is sufficient?
Posted 10 years ago # -
Ok, the mistake is clear: the problem sits as usual in front of the machine! ;-)
From Slitaz 4 I was used that I have to run the kernel command line including „nomodeset" to get a sufficient good result. If I stop this when booting the harddrive installatio I get immediately the desired resolution!
The driver in use is nouveau!Thanks a lot for you help!
Posted 10 years ago # -
What video driver is being used when you boot the install to 1024x768?
OK, glad you figured it out.Posted 10 years ago # -
@mojo
Sorry, this I could not figure out. The driver nouveau had been loaded, but when the boot was done with the line including „nomodeset“ it went wrong. I was not able to interprete the contradictory results. Now it is perfect! ;-)Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.