As kernel 3.16 will end next april - https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html - what will happen with SliTaz?
I just quote some lines from Alexej - http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/meet-slitaz-next64/page/3:
Sorry, the development of SliTaz Next stopped. It's hard to non-programmer to follow all the updates on the one hand, and to find reliable patches to the legacy on the other hand. About a week ago I tried to follow LFS to update the toolchain. No luck. Every time gcc failed to make the new version of itself after long, more than a hour, runs.
I think I can't cope with the software. And I think I should not repeat the things already resolved on other Linux distributions by myself. I think it will better if I'll use some other small Linux distro, most-least actively developed, with good package base and without systemd :) Well, I think I'll use its packages to make SliTaz clone (like made tower using cubes) and will make SliTaz native packages to it if I will need them.
Maybe Pascal or Hans Guenther have an idea, how tho continue and fix SliTaz next - this would be at the moment the best and quickest solution.
On the other hand, there is no cross compilation in next, and I think a SliTaz ARM Branch would be great, because ARM-devices are getting more and more important - a lot of new ARM Laptops with windows are coming in autumn (Snapdragon 8cx, Snapdragon SQ1)
So I think, the idea of forking another distribution is not a bad idea.
I am not convinced by Adelie. Adelie linux is a fork of Alpine linux - https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/alpine-devel/%3C5975E0C0.1030008%40adelielinux.org%3E - and I wanted to try Adelie 1.0 RC4 on my machines and it does not even boot.
I tried quite a lot of distributions, because on my new machines, SliTaz with kernel 3.16 does not run and I am mainly convinced by Arch and Alpine.
I use arch-arm on most of my arm devices (Odroid U3, Pine Rock64, EspressoBin) and alpine on the Raspberrys (its quicker) - on my Intel Celeron Laptops I use at the moment porteus - but not very convinced.
So lets have a look on arch:
Arch is based on systemd - so not really suitable for SliTaz, but there is a OpenRC/runit-clone of arch - Artix - https://artixlinux.org/, so it could be worth looking on it.
And my favorit still is Alpine Linux:
Without systemd, busybox based, 32 and 64 bit and arm version - https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Alpine_on_ARM
And I think, that not only Aleksej can present a Alpine-SliTaz version, I think, that most of the SliTaz users can do this:
A good intro is this article: https://blog.overops.com/my-alpine-desktop-setting-up-a-software-development-environment-on-alpine-linux/
And Alpine has a tool like tazlito - https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/How_to_make_a_custom_ISO_image_with_mkimage
I think, quite a lot of the SliTaz tools should somehow work - of course with some small modifications, because also busibox based and then we can share the image and develope it further on.
Personally I would vote for a fusion of Alpine and SliTaz, but this has to be decided by somebody else.
At the moment, I do not have time, but in february and march, I think, with my kind of knowledge I could join this special dev-team.