You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I have tried opening https websites on midori, tazweb, and retawq but cannot open. It says
TLS/SSL support not available; install glib-networking
But even after installing glib-networking package nothing worked
Offline
Close midori,tazweb
#tazpkg recharge
#tazpkg -gi p11-kit
Open midori,tazweb
Offline
It did not worked. Still cannot open https sites
Offline
@zealkaiser
We are neighbours. I cannot do it either. There is a file in /etc/pkcs11 that should be named as pkcs11.conf but I have no idea how to configure that.
I looked into the net: puh, high graded professional stuff, not for you or me. The guys who introduced for sure had some thoughts about it - but, dear friends, easy digestible howtos are missing.
A workaround: use firefox! Though this is not what was intended, was it?
Offline
Hi,
Strange, juste tested with Tazweb and cant'reproduce. Is your cooking up-to-date ? Did you edit files in /etc ? May you try to reinstall webkit and other related packages. You can also try to boot latest rolling (build with all latest cooking packages) and see if it's work in live with default settings: http://mirror.slitaz.org/iso/rolling/
[attachment=6218,315]
- Christophe
Offline
Yes, I will try this, but, ähm, tonight, later. Spent the whole day with this Nvidia sh... and still I have no solution. May be at the end I compiled the module correct but it might not work with this kernel - at the end! ;-)
Or, more likely, I am not adult enough to install the module correct... :-(
Offline
ok, 40', not too bad for an old man. Yes, it works! From slitaz-core...
But, damned, from the older version it did not work, really! Ätsch...
Offline
If you ask me: yes, I am nice man. And very patient. Because otherwise I would have stopped these silly things - like establishing a slitaz so that it can compile Gummi just in order to see that Glibc > 2.20 is necessary. Because then, you know, I am at the end of my scope. I only know that I would break the system if I try to establish some alien new Glibc. That means: not adult enough! ;-)
Offline
I hope I will be old but not yet completely adult :-)
That said, we have glib 2.30.2 in cooking and I think it will compile nicely under SliTaz. When building from source you need some development packages such as glib-dev. You may also like slitaz receipt and way to cook packages because our build tools will install all the necesary -dev packages, build it and remove installed packages in one command.
If I have time I will do a receipt and package for Gummi. Note also that developers love to make packages for users, so somtime just ask for a new packages, here, on SCN or the mailing list.
- Christophe
Offline
Christmas is not today, is it?
1 stone hit 2 birds... Gummi (and
later: LaTex?) plus a recent Glibc. Wow! So tomorrow I have to upgrade my ,,compiling" version of cooker. See I have 1 GB RAM and this is not too much for such tasks.
But I assure you: some nice LaTex-editors with a good, but small LaTeX-,,motor" are the entrance for the real academic world. Microsoft is for the secretaries and the very, very young students only there.
Offline
Hi,
Can you give a try to Gummi package I just cooked, seems ok for me but I dont have Latex installed. If package works I will commit it to cooking repo:
http://people.slitaz.org/~pankso/packages/gummi-0.6.1.tazpkg
And here is how the receipt look like:
http://people.slitaz.org/~pankso/wok/gummi/receipt
Offline
Hi pankso,
thank you very much, indeed! Yes, it works, but we still would need the foundation, let us assume the ,,texlive" (Mininum) compilation program, that sits in /usr/share/texmf-texlive on an Mandriva 2010.2 installation, for example. That looks damned complete, may be a bit overloaded.
559.1M /usr/share/texmf-texlive
My guess (I really do not know how big the circle of people is, who read regularly this forum, how motivated they are and how apt to contribute) is that one should put this Gummi on the repo, but all of us should immediately start to collect information/advice about what is the minimum necessary to get a compiling texlive collection.
On Mandriva (I use this for work, not that much for fun) i have Kile, texmaker and TeXMacs (Slitaz has this as well! I do not know to what extent one use the parts of TeXMacs for Gummi as well!). My basic idea still is a kind of AppRun (which all necessary parts and auxilliary programs incorporated, so that it would work on each platform!). I proposed it on their platform but did not get any feedback until now. And I have no idea how often they read their own homepage! ;-)
Offline
@pankso
I installed gummi on a slitaz 3.0-installation. The dependencies were installed. Installation was without giving any error. The icon is shown in the panel.
Installation of : gummi-0.6.1
================================================================================
Copying gummi-0.6.1... [ OK ]
Extracting gummi-0.6.1... 490 blocks
Extracting the pseudo fs... (lzma) 1710 blocks
Installing gummi... [ OK ]
Removing all tmp files... [ OK ]
================================================================================
gummi (0.6.1) is installed.
root@slitaz:/home/tux/Desktop# exit
tux@slitaz:~$ gummi &
tux@slitaz:~$ gummi: error while loading shared libraries: libpoppler-glib.so.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
(Is it possible/meaningful to resolve this dependency under 3.0? We are testing anyway, as gummi cannot run without an texlive-installation under slitaz anyway)
A positive feedback: with 3.0 on an old machine with 500 MB RAM and an old nvidia GeForce 6600 the ,,tazhw setup nvidia non-free" worked perfect. Kernel: 2.6.30.6-slitaz
The same thing with cooking did not work, though.
Offline
@michaelbischof dont use cooking use the rolling iso - there are to many errors in cooking
http://mirror.slitaz.org/iso/rolling/
see also here: http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/wanted-new-cooking-iso
Offline
@kultex
Ähm, sorry, I was incorrect: I used the rolling iso. It did not work.
2.6.37-slitaz is its kernel.
I mistook ,,cooking" with ,,core".
Offline
just to be clear - rolling and cooking - both have kernel 2.6.37, but bzImage and vmlinuz are different
Offline
Thanks a lot, I did not know that. What can I say: no wonder then? ;-)
(I am astonished what a difference it makes whether one uses the nv or the non-free driver. I am not sure, Trixar_za most likely would know that better, whether can set the offers of this nvidia-settings-manager with a suitable configuration-file up to the same quality. This I did not learn yet)
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Generated in 0.017 seconds, 7 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.57 MiB (Peak: 1.77 MiB) ]