SliTaz Forum
Vous n'êtes pas connecté.
Hi there!
I'm proud to present you SliTaz Next64.
It, just like the SliTaz Next, offers you actual versions of packages.
But it's really 64-bit. That's all.
Currently, all those packages that I made on my laptop are re-done now on the server.
More precisely, the first part. Basic packages - everything that is listed in the LFS book.
Then other packages, such as GTK+, Openbox and Mesa will be re-done too.
Until then, please keep yourself from sending changes to wok-next.
Do not need to re-do the work that has already been done. Even if it is not yet visible ;-)
As usual, a lot of work in the new repository, and I can not say anything definite
about when a new ready for work 64-bit ISO image will be released.
Have a nice day
Hors ligne
lets try it now on my new eeepc.
i will add to my march report if there is anything missing regarding end user quality 
ps: when will be "stable" slitaz 5? then 6? because it's 7 after next?
Hors ligne
so it's exactly like slitaz next, or it's a 64 version of next undone?
i mean, i see in your post mesa... which is related to the screen... etc.. does its works exactly like next?
Hors ligne
btw, where is the iso download link?
Hors ligne
Hi lm2,
> ps: when will be "stable" slitaz 5? then 6? because it's 7 after next?
SliTaz Next isn't 5 or 6 nor 7.
It's my side project, and I don't want to number it in this way.
I really don't know when "stable" slitaz 5 will be released.
I guess you can ask the same person who was released all the previous SliTaz from 1 up to 4.
> so it's exactly like slitaz next, or it's a 64 version of next undone?
Maybe I misunderstood the question.
Both SliTaz Next and SliTaz Next64 share the same receipts: same versions, same patches etc.
> btw, where is the iso download link?
Please re-read initial post more MORE carefully :-D
Hors ligne
>and I can not say anything definite
about when a new ready for work 64-bit ISO image will be released.
going to cry....
going to install next, because of no choice...
ty anyway, alek.
Hors ligne
Really, I not touched yet the big part of ISO contained Webkit and Xorg video drivers.
Hmm… And Isolinux bootloader, my lovely pain, not touched too.
Hors ligne
Hi aleksej,
Great news, thanks a lot to your work .
I have own project to build LFS full 64 bits, but try to based them upon Busybox 
.
If needed, i can help
Best regards.
Hors ligne
>I guess you can ask the same person who was released all the previous SliTaz from 1 up to 4.
who is it? 'the hell is he/she doin?
Hors ligne
@lm2
> who is it? 'the hell is he/she doin?
You ask, I answer.
https://twitter.com/pankso
You should know him, come on! :-D
Hors ligne
Hi shann,
> I have own project to build LFS full 64 bits, but try to based them upon Busybox .
> If needed, i can help
It looks like there's no problem with LFS packages and with Busybox.
The most of the problems here are with old / legacy software and with highly patched software too (like Syslinux). But not. There's not the biggest problem. It's permissible to say sometimes "sorry, I give up" and to say good bye to some old soft and to switch to something other.
But the biggest problems is time and motivation.
Thanks our sponsors we have fast and big servers for our needs.
But free time and motivation are limited :-)
Hors ligne
Infact, SliTaz is right example that possible .
Sometimes, need to new way, use modern softs, but in same time, try to preserve compatibility.
Yes, having good infra help for project.
Yes of course, but i think all community can help few times to increase this work charge.
Hors ligne
Sometimes some "heavy magic" is required to revive such old software :-)
The only question is whether it is appropriate.
Are you ready to spend the precious time of your life on it or not?
But it is not exactly.
The programs live while they are used. While they are supported.
While fixing compilation errors and while making them work with the updated system libraries.
As far as I know, good support of the old software in Debian.
They are great, and I think that we can solve almost all the problems using their patches.
But it is not exactly too.
SliTaz have its own sub-projects, and I'm afraid that anyone will not fix the number of incompatibilities and bugs in the projects such as SliTaz Installer, TazPanel or Syslinux bootloader :-(
Hors ligne
I broke the glibc package for SliTaz Next :-((
It compiled well, but then all system appeared broken, no one command work with error:
[c]Inconsistency detected by ld.so: get-dynamic-info.h: 146: elf_get_dynamic_info:
Assertion 'info[DT_RPATH] == NULL' failed!
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: get-dynamic-info.h: 146: elf_get_dynamic_info:
Assertion 'info[DT_RPATH] == NULL' failed!
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: get-dynamic-info.h: 146: elf_get_dynamic_info:
Assertion 'info[DT_RPATH] == NULL' failed!
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: get-dynamic-info.h: 146: elf_get_dynamic_info:
Assertion 'info[DT_RPATH] == NULL' failed!
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: get-dynamic-info.h: 146: elf_get_dynamic_info:
Assertion 'info[DT_RPATH] == NULL' failed!
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: get-dynamic-info.h: 146: elf_get_dynamic_info:
Assertion 'info[DT_RPATH] == NULL' failed!
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: get-dynamic-info.h: 146: elf_get_dynamic_info:
Assertion 'info[DT_RPATH] == NULL' failed!
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: get-dynamic-info.h: 146: elf_get_dynamic_info:
Assertion 'info[DT_RPATH] == NULL' failed!
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: get-dynamic-info.h: 146: elf_get_dynamic_info:
Assertion 'info[DT_RPATH] == NULL' failed![/c]
And I should to go to work very soon. Will continue tomorrow.
Any ideas?
Hors ligne
>You should know him, come on! :-D
i knew him, but he's now the slitaz mind, as the slitaz ghost..
i can't know him anymore because he left us.. he abandonned us..
the fact would be : does slitaz 5 will have a final stable release?
Hors ligne
You so loud. Again... :-[
> does slitaz 5 will have a final stable release?
Make your assumptions. Who will do it?
If not me...
Not Pankso...
Not Pascal...
... then who?
Hors ligne
>... then who?
hmm.
let me think : the person who initiated it?
i'm sorry of being loud.. but sometimes end users are expecting things from software developpers.. if we can't give a feedback, we just have to leave.. sadly to come up here..
Hors ligne
lm2 - this is my last warning - if you dont stop to fool around I kick you out of the forum
Hors ligne
hi
i gave a try to this
http://mirror1.slitaz.org/iso/next/slitaz-next-lxqt.iso
why dont I find any tazbox or any tool to help me connect to wireless or ethernet ?
Hi moulefrite,
At first, this topic is devoted to SliTaz Next64, and there's no SliTaz Next64 ISO on the Earth yet.
Your link point to 32-bit SliTaz Next ISO.
Secondly, SliTaz Next and SliTaz Next64 are only PoC (Proof of Concept). I made ISO in order to test whether it boot and run, or not. I specifically not added GRUB, SliTaz Installer and some other things I don't recall now to that ISO: it is only Live CD.
Thirdly, tool to configure Wi-Fi connection exists (although you may use command line and plain text configuration file).
But just after SliTaz-4.0 was released, this tool require web browser to show its interface (or maybe it happens early before SliTaz-4.0 release).
You asks about SliTaz Next LXQt -> it is based on LXQt -> which is based on Qt5 -> for which SliTaz Next still miss Qt-based web browser.
As the solution you may install any of other available web browser, based on GTK+2 or GTK+3 with the respective GTK libraries, for example, Vivaldi. Then you may open TazPanel in your web browser and proceed to the Network tab and then to Wireless menu item.
And lastly, TazPanel has written for using in the old WebkitGTK engine-based web browsers. It (TazPanel) contain some old and undocumented hacks concerning authorization and root permissions. Using TazPanel in the modern web browser is a PITA: you should enter user name and password literally on the EVERY page of TazPanel.
Hors ligne
hm, I like lxqt as far used not with openbox but with jwm as we, old SliTaz users, were accostumed with the use of jwm...
it would be a good reason to use some SliTaz-lxqt distro!
There are some old Qt browser working well and never taken in consideration in SliTaz. Without fans, some developers finish by renounce to continue their project. I suppose QtWeb is such one!
QtWeb, yes, the very old version continue to be one of the best and polyvalent browser and seems to be a qt based web browsers or not?
on a lot of distributions, it can be considered as a very small browser with such power (ok, in Debian Jessie, I have razor preinstalled. To add jwm to razor, only go to ~/.config/razor/session.conf and introduce jwm in the line window_manager= !
in lxqt, it is the same!)
Qt-Web satisfy very exigent requirement of French and German people concerning ability to manage replays from national French TV or email from major email supplier gmx.net (both very exigent concerning quality of browser requiring access).
Hors ligne
oh yes, my bad :à
did u miss something in ur update of january ? Coz look, Alanyih screenshot
http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/slitaz-next-i-give-up#post-45399
i see wifi-configuration. Do the Slitaz-Config terminal working ?
An update of Slitaz lxqt is planned ?
Guys!
I like your attention to this topic.
But have you ever read the title of this topic and at least my first post in this topic?
What are we talking about here?
Do you know that you yourself can create topics on this forum?
You can create a topic and ask your question, and do not write this question in the first caught topic.
My technical theme, my announcement of Next64 is like a dump.
Forum is sucks :-(((
> did u miss something in ur update of january ? Coz look, Alanyih screenshot
I can't recall what missed there, it was relatively long ago. You may check it yourself.
> i see wifi-configuration.
I'm too. You haven't that menu item?
> Do the Slitaz-Config terminal working ?
What is the Slitaz-Config and why couldn't you just to check it?
> An update of Slitaz lxqt is planned ?
Yes, of course. I like up-to-date packages.
Hors ligne
yes, there is slitaz-config is there in the iso ..i checked. But no xterm , tazlito , tazweb .. etc... lot of features missing when right click on a file ("rename" for exemple).
no, unfortunality i dont have wifi setting in the menu .. strange.. but slitaz-config seems managing wifi configuration
Answers are simple. This ISO isn't the thing what you are expected. It is only PoC that was created to answer the questions in sort of "What if...?":
- We have all the new packages in SliTaz Next repository. What if we made the ISO, will it boot at all?
- What if make ISO using only LXQt packages? Will it be usable? RazorQt was a sort of interesting, but looking very incomplete...
> But no xterm , tazlito , tazweb .. etc...
Here only LXQt. No GTK. It is LXQt PoC.
> lot of features missing when right click on a file ("rename" for exemple).
Here PCManFM-Qt. No GTK-based PCManFM. It developed less years, and yes, some features not released yet.
Hors ligne
[ Généré en 0.019 secondes, 8 requêtes exécutées - Utilisation de la mémoire: 1.59 MiO (Pic : 1.77 MiO) ]