SliTaz Forum

shann

Administrator

Registered: 2011-04-01

Posts: 1,296

Website

Docker on current

Hi,

Friend ask me if we have docker on SliTaz and also if SliTaz base is smaller than Alpine

tux@slitaz:~$ docker info

Client:

Version:    28.4.0

Context:    default

Debug Mode: false

Server:

Containers: 0

  Running: 0

  Paused: 0

  Stopped: 0

Images: 0

Server Version: 28.4.0

Storage Driver: overlay2

  Backing Filesystem: tmpfs

  Supports d_type: true

  Using metacopy: false

  Native Overlay Diff: true

  userxattr: false

Logging Driver: json-file

Cgroup Driver: cgroupfs

Cgroup Version: 1

Plugins:

  Volume: local

  Network: bridge host ipvlan macvlan null overlay

  Log: awslogs fluentd gcplogs gelf journald json-file local splunk syslog

CDI spec directories:

  /etc/cdi

  /var/run/cdi

Swarm: inactive

Runtimes: io.containerd.runc.v2 runc

Default Runtime: runc

Init Binary: docker-init

containerd version: b98a3aace656320842a23f4a392a33f46af97866

runc version: v1.3.0-0-g4ca628d

init version: de40ad0

Security Options:

  seccomp

   Profile: builtin

Kernel Version: 5.10.238-slitaz64

OSType: linux

Architecture: x86_64

CPUs: 4

Total Memory: 3.839GiB

Name: slitaz

ID: d36f8e84-7d7f-42e4-a61d-bdafa9647e8c

Docker Root Dir: /var/lib/docker

Debug Mode: false

Experimental: false

Insecure Registries:

  ::1/128

  127.0.0.0/8

Live Restore Enabled: false

Product License: Community Engine

We have similar footprint for base, infact we don't have musl libc (648k vs 1.9M glibc), also we have locales in /usr/share/i18n, not present in alpine.

[attachment=53283,3737]

n4jm4

Member

Registered: 2026-02-02

Posts: 1

Re: Docker on current

The images on Docker Hub have some quirks:

* 9 years out of date

* authenticity not formally verified

* Using wacky custom tags to differentiate ISA's, instead of buildx tags.

https://hub.docker.com/u/slitaz

I believe Docker provides CI/CD, which would help the images to keep up to date with emerging SliTaz releases.

shann

Administrator

Registered: 2011-04-01

Posts: 1,296

Website

Re: Docker on current

Hi Andrew,

Infact images is old, build by community user few year ago.

To answer about authenticity, agree with you use "slitaz" name not good idea if project would like push official image in future.

In this case images was builded by community user we know (alanyih).

It's on my todo list to take this point and provide docker images for cooking and 6.0.