SliTaz SliTaz Forum archive

This forum is now a read-only archive

The SliTaz community has moved to Maille, a forum made for SliTaz.

We looked hard for a replacement for this aging forum, including a move from bbPress to FluxBB last June. But spam bots now get through sign-up even with mail confirmation, and these forum engines are barely maintained anymore. So we wrote a forum in the SliTaz spirit: small, fast, no JavaScript, works on old machines and in text browsers. Everything here stays readable.

Go to Maille

You are not logged in.

#1 2013-04-05 05:43:59

deadwait
Member
Registered: 2013-04-04
Posts: 14

nanorc does not have any effect on nano usage

hi team,

whatever options i use in nanorc seem to be having no effect on nano, neither syntax highlighting for bash files work, nor does smooth scrolling or tabsize, anybody face similar issue? how did you resolve it?

Offline

#2 2013-04-05 09:12:09

deadwait
Member
Registered: 2013-04-04
Posts: 14

Re: nanorc does not have any effect on nano usage

copied /etc/nanorc to my home directory and renamed it to .nanorc and now it works fine.

seems my head does not work till i post the issue on the forum smile

Offline

#3 2013-04-05 09:21:43

lexeii
Administrator
Registered: 2012-03-21
Posts: 1,853

Re: nanorc does not have any effect on nano usage

You're first! wink

Yes, here is little fail in the nano receipt (and I have no my wifi internet at the moment to fix receipt, writing on smartphone).

strace nano shows that nano looking rc in a weird place: /usr/etc/nanorc (must be /etc/nanorc); then looking for the ~/.nanorc

Maintainers, try to add --sysconfdir=/etc to configure options into receipt.

Offline

#4 2013-04-05 09:58:55

deadwait
Member
Registered: 2013-04-04
Posts: 14

Re: nanorc does not have any effect on nano usage

thanks for that input aleksej ill recook it on my system with the given option

Offline

Registered users online in this topic: 0, guests: 1
[Bot] ClaudeBot

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB
Modified by Visman

[ Generated in 0.016 seconds, 7 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.54 MiB (Peak: 1.77 MiB) ]